Pakistan's Leading Education Website & Teacher's Provider
English language
Home | Forum | Teacher | Student | Institution | Jobs | Admission guide | Tests | Study abroad | Notices | classified | Study partner

A complete archive of Pakistan's Education news releases since 2007

New: Rawalpindi Inter result 2014   |   KU BCom, BA supple exams   |   PU BCom exam 2014 schedule

Lahore Inter exams schedule   |   AIOU admission forms schedule   |   CSS Examination 2015

Find Pak classmates
Pakistani classmatesDirectory since 1947. Find Now >>

HEC's number game

May 2008: During the last sixty years, the number of PhDs in Pakistan has risen from approximately 50 to 2000. The Higher Education Commission of Pakistan claims that this number will rise to 20,000 by 2015. In order to produce the additional 18,000 PhDs, HEC has launched various local and foreign initiatives.

If this PhD factory cranks out the new PhDs, it will definitely break all world records, but will it make any difference to the nature of scientific research in Pakistan? Will there be any use of these new PhDs? What will Pakistan be like in 2015 with all these PhDs? Where will they work?

These questions are seldom asked in Pakistan. Not many are interested in examining deeper issues related to science and higher education. Appearances substitute for substance. In the rest of the world, a PhD degree merely indicates that the holder has gone through a certain amount of training in a chosen field of research. This research, however, takes place in a wider cultural, economic, and political context. In France, for instance, the holder of a PhD degree in a specific branch of chemistry is likely to be absorbed into an industry or research sector related to that field because his or her training has been specifically geared to the needs of that industry or field of research. In fact, the very process of production of PhDs is thoroughly linked to the overall scientific and industrial sectors of the Western countries. Not so in Pakistan.

The new PhD cranking mechanism set up by HEC has no home-grown components; it has nothing to link this misadventure with the actual needs of the country. Such components of research-related industry do not even exist. One can argue that scientific research need not be utilitarian, it can be basic or "pure" research, providing knowledge about the physical cosmos. If one were to accept this doctrine, there is still the hard fact that for a country like Pakistan research for the sake of research is an ill-afforded luxury. A country where even the most basic infrastructure is absent can hardly produce anything worth value in basic science.

As for utility-driven research, Pakistan has no industry which requires such research. Almost all of Pakistan's industry is operating on a turn-key basis, requiring technicians, not PhDs. Its defence sector does have a genuine need for research, but that kind of research does not need 20,000 PhDs. Even most of the defence-related research requires able technologists, not scientists, although the difference is seldom understood in Pakistan.

The emphatic speeches calling for scientific research turn into a soup with too many arbitrary components. To spice these speeches, the speakers often add national pride to their recipe. In almost all public forums, the lament is always about Pakistan not producing enough science. (When the occasion demands, "Pakistan" is replaced with "Muslim world.") What does it mean to say that Pakistan does not produce enough science? Those who repeat this slogan-like statement ad nauseam mean that Pakistanis do not publish enough papers in international scientific journals. They assume that science is some kind of international race in which each country is supposed to take part, and since Pakistan is far behind in the race, it is a matter of national shame. The fact is that there is no such race; every country contributing to the global scientific knowledge is doing so through an integrated system in which its industry, education and economy are all inter-linked to each other, and, whatever scientific knowledge is produced, it is produced through this integrated system which benefits its economy. In Pakistan, this linkage has never existed.

Under the maverick leadership of the HEC Chairman, Pakistan is supposed to bypass all these necessary links and achieve a scientific renaissance through an ad hoc process in which a self-styled visionary makes all the decisions about what should be done. The result is utter disaster and colossal waste. For example, the HEC Chairman announced on June 25, 2005, that HEC has sanctioned 180 million rupees ($3 million) for the establishment of a 5 MeV tandem Van de Graaf accelerator to be housed at the National Centre for Physics at Quaid-e-Azam University. The announcement came amid all the fanfare with which such announcements are made. But the few journalists listening to the announcement had no idea that such Van de Graaf machines are now museum pieces, if not basic junk. Those who sat on the left and right of the HEC Chairman with broad smiles either had no knowledge or no moral courage, or neither, to say a word about why and how this decision was made. Those who pointed out the folly behind buying such junk were quickly blacklisted.

HEC decides that Pakistan needs more universities. A programme is launched to set up universities all over the country, even in places where there are not even enough schools. But the Chairman wants to show progress, activity. The solution is easy: take down the boards of existing colleges, repaint them as such-and-such university, and you have universities all over the country. Then initiate a publicity orgy and claim that HEC has increased the number of universities in the country from 23 to 47. The number game may satisfy the egos of some, but to an objective observer, the future of science and higher education in Pakistan looks bleak because there is no backbone to this whole effort.

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal
The writer is a freelance columnist. Email: quantumnotes@gmail.com - The News


Your Comments

"Sir, I am totally agreed with you. You have analyzed very well the number game of HEC. These PhD's only be beneficial if the government established new high standard universities and research centers and appoint only sincere people. Otherwise these PhD's will move to other countries and proved to be brain drain for Pakistan and they will be treated as a source of foreign reserves for the country just like other overseas employees incase they send money to their native land. They might also be helpful for the Country if they work outside the county and after getting more experience of their relative fields, they come back and stat working for the country."
Name: Muhammad Qasim Yousaf
Email: futurepakistan@yahoo.com
City, Country: Gujrat, Pakistan

"Salam, I salute you sir.You have rightly analyzed. However I would like to add more. I have always fought the rote system and have suffered by low academic grades and criticism from home and relatives. I need to say that rote system is wrong and this rogue educational system is producing trash. People graduate and do masters but dont even know the basics. New education system should be introduced. Objective type should have 70% consisting conceptual questions. Trained teachers should be there in the educational institutions. Early education is the most important. It should be emphasized and improved. If the foundations are strong then the later education is more easy to gain. As you are talking of skilled workers. The government has to enforce laws for the industrialists to increase the wages of skilled workers. Otherwise no one will be motivated to spend money for fees for acquiring expertise in any field. "
Name: Omer
Email: sipraomer@hotmail.com
City, Country: Lahore, Pakistan

"Pakistan is ruled by illiterates in each and every ground and need to continue on similar ground. National need to suffer under these illiterates till the time system is completely collapsed. In developed nations rules, thinker and write encourage research in all disciplined where research is building block of society. Basic goals are to produce researcher where tools are not preferred. Tools and equipment can be produced by these researches. Foundation of research is building block and foundation of these nation. I strongly disagree and find most un-desirable view I have ever seen"
Name: Yasir
Email: yirshad@yahoo.com
City, Country: Sweden

spacer
Post your Comments/ Views about the news.
*Your name
*Your Email
*City &Country(i.e. Karachi, Pakistan)
*Type your Comments here:

*Type the code shown

BER19FRI




The Interface may edit your comments and not all comments will be published.
Education Rss FeedEducation RSS Feed*New
Education News
Updated: 14 Oct, 2014
arrow Rawalpindi Inter result 2014
arrow CSS Examination 2015
arrow KU BCom, BA supple exams
arrow PU BCom exam 2014 schedule
arrow Abolish entrance test system
arrow Comsats Institute convocation
arrow Medical colleges open merit sytem
arrow Creation of Punjab HEC
arrow NUST ranked 500 university
arrow Tameer School Programme
arrow Punjab University turned 133
arrow Lahore Inter exams from Oct 23
arrow Higher education to become dream
arrow AIOU admission forms schedule
arrow KU Dr Auj's murder case
arrow Govt colleges admission lists
arrow Sindh University corruption
arrow SZABIST graduation ceremony
arrow PMDC move causes shortage
arrow KPK textbooks change protest
arrow HEC universities research funds
arrow IIUI students scholarships
arrow NTS test for Sindh teachers
arrow GCUF sexually harassment

More Edu. News>>

Tuition
Personalize Resume