Whither quality education at government schools?
Primary education in public schools has always been substandard
Karachi, Jan 20: The first ten years of schooling typically build the foundations
for a bright professional career of an individual. High quality education up to
secondary level therefore merits the attention, investment and high priority of
the government. However, in our education system, primary education imparted at
the majority of government and public schools has always been
substandard. Whatever may be the reasons but the poor standards of school
education have compelled parents to work get their children educated in private
schools. Consequently the market for schools where the Cambridge system of
education is in place has been thriving while parents are not even afraid to
work overtime to meet the financial requirements of an expensive
education. Yet only a segment of society, most likely those with
finically sound backgrounds, are able to avail this facility. Moreover, this
dual standard of secondary and intermediate education is also creating a class
difference where the rich can get quality education both locally and abroad but
the poor can't even get good education locally. In fact, the ever increasing
inflation coupled with high tuition fees of private schools has compelled people
to undergo a great deal of hardship to bear the education expenses of their
children. The poor standards of our education system are exposed when
students are required to take international exams like IELTS, TOEFL, GRE, GMAT
etc. While those educated through local examination boards struggle to even pass
these exams, students of Cambridge System and top private schools do
exceptionally well in these exams. Be it English, Math or any other subject,
school education plays a vital role in the career development of individuals and
thus is of key importance. Under the given conditions, the SMB Fatima
Jinnah Government Girls Secondary School, Nishtar Road, Garden is a ray of hope
for every child who wants to get quality education for free. One and a half
years ago, the school was a typical government school where stray dogs wandered
in class rooms and posed a threat to students. There was no discipline or sense
of education, while mismanagement was at its peak. Visitors used to describe the
apathetic learning environment and infrastructure, while even teachers would not
admit their children in the same school because of pitiable
standards. Luckily, Zindagi Trust in Collaboration with Book Group
adopted the school and converted it into a model school that could be compared
with the best private schools of the city. Some 1500 girls, mainly from poor
families, are now enrolled at the SMB School. The coalition government
in Sindh also has no option but to support what they collectively termed as a
successful project. In fact everyone who visited the aforesaid school did not
believe that the SMB was a government school because of the improved
conditions. What is even more important at this stage is that SMB School
alone cannot educate all the children who dream of and deserve to get the best
education. It is the responsibility of both the Sindh Government and the City
District Government Karachi to replicate the model of SMB School in all
government schools in the city and the rest of Sindh. By supporting the project
the government will be able to help millions of children acquire quality
education, which would increase the literacy rate. Moreover, the local and
provincial governments should also hire volunteers or competent teachers for
managing the affairs of government schools which are following the model of the
SMB School. However, it is most unfortunate to note that some sections of
society do not want the volunteers to continue. The same elements have also
raised objections and expressed reservations about the aforesaid NGO for reasons
best known to them. In fact, it is these elements who should be questioned as to
why they are against a project that poses no obvious threat. Why don't they
support people who are helping the government to improve education standards of
government schools? The adage "actions speak louder than words" will
eventually prove who the real advocates of universal quality education are, and
which interests are more likely to hinder progress made in this regard. -farooq.baloch@thenews.com.pk
Workshop on importance of Nutraceuticals tomorrow
Karachi: The International Centre for Chemical and Biological Sciences
(ICCBS) at the University of Karachi (KU) is holding a workshop titled
'HEC-British Council Workshop on Nutraceuticals' on Wednesday (tomorrow) at the
ICCBS auditorium. The workshop is jointly being organised by the Higher
Education Commission (HEC) and British Council Pakistan. According to an
ICCBS press release that was issued on Monday, the objective of the research is
to discuss the importance of functional and bioactive components in
Nutraceutical foods, and to promote the production of Nutraceutical foods at
industrial scale. Edible products with healing capacity are known as
nutraceuticals. An important objective of the conference is to highlight the
relationship between the treatment of diseases and nutraceutical foods. The
bioactive constituents of many foods have been identified during evidence-based
scientific studies and are used frequently in community and clinical nutrition.
Such foods include turmeric, carrots, fruits/vegetables, sea foods and
mushrooms. KU Vice Chancellor Prof. Pirzada Qasim will inaugurate the
workshop while Prof. Dr Atta-ur-Rahman, Coordinator General, COMSTECH and former
Chairman HEC will be the guest of honour at the inaugural ceremony. The News
Your Comments
"need any job"
Name: inayat
Email: inayat740535@yahoo.com
City, Country: sukkur
Post your comments
Offer letters issued to 741 lecturers by mistake, SHC told
Karachi: The selection of 741 lecturers by an improperly-constituted Sindh Public Service Commission in 2006 was flawed and
the offer letters were issued to them in June 2008 by mistake, the Sindh High
Court was informed on behalf of the chief minister on Monday. A rejoinder
submitted by Assistant Advocate-General Adnan Karim Memon after seeking
instructions said the chief minister was fully empowered to accept or reject the
commission's recommendation without assigning any reason under Section 7 of the
SPSC Act. In the lecturers' case, however, the CM scrutinised the record
and found many discrepancies "in result making and mark sheets". Besides, SHC
Justice Faisal Arab, who conducted an inquiry into the selection of district and
deputy district attorneys by the SPSC, also detected several defects in the
selection procedure. The matter was discussed by the provincial cabinet and it
decided that the SPSC recommendations in respect of the over 740 successful
candidates should be rejected, the CM said in the statement submitted on his
behalf. The CM said the cabinet also decided to withdraw the offer
letters issued by the government in June 2008 by mistake. The decision to accept
the recommendations was taken by the caretaker government in Nov 2007-February
2008 without any mandate to decide long-term policy matters. The caretakers
should have confined themselves to day-to-day affairs of the government and
arrangements to hold free and fair elections. Accordingly, the CM said, the
provincial cabinet asked the education department to withdraw the requisition
made by it in 2005 and make a fresh requisition to the reconstituted SPSC. The
candidates recommended earlier would be free to be reconsidered without applying
afresh, the CM said. Representing the petitioner lecturers, Advocates
Shua-un-Nabi and Zamir Ghumro submitted in the petitions and in their arguments
that the candidates were duly selected by a legally and validly constituted
service commission. The caretakers had nothing to do with their selection. They
appeared in the written and viva voce examinations in 2006 and were finally
selected in 2007 after clearing police inquiry and medical test. They were not
to blame if the SPSC was not properly constituted. They passed through a lengthy
and cumbersome procedure to earn a vested right to employment. The
counsel said the offer letters were issued by the present government headed by
the respondent chief minister in June 2008. They could not be deprived of a
precious vested right on the pretext of a 'mistake'. They argued that neither
the requisition and SPSC advertisement of 2005 nor their tests and interviews in
2006 nor their selection in 2007 nor the offer letters could be withdrawn. Many
of the candidates might have exceeded the prescribed age-limit. The petition had
not been rendered infructuous by the CM's reply, they contended.The bench put
off hearing to Jan 29 to decide whether the petitioners should file a new
petition to challenge the new requisition. Dawn
Post your comments
|