KU MBBS supple forms | National Education Policy

KU exam form submission dates
Karachi, May 28, 2008: The examinations department, University of Karachi (KU) has notified the students of all medical Colleges affiliated with it that the examination forms and fee of third professional MBBS supplementary examination-2008 will be accepted from May 30 to June 6, 2008. Furthermore, the examination forms and fee for Bachelor of Physical Education (B.P.Ed.) annual examination -2008 will be accepted at the respective colleges from June 2 to June 14, 2008 without late fee. The News

Post your comments

National Education Policy seeks free primary schooling
Karachi: The deadline for input on the National Education Policy is May 31, Saturday, after which the government is supposed to announce the plan. Approval may take a while as the Federal Education Minister, the PML-N's Ahsan Iqbal, resigned.

The provinces have been asked to give their suggestions on the policy so they can affirm the goal of achieving universal and free primary education by 2015 and up to class 10 by 2025. Provincial and area governments are meant to develop plans to achieve these targets, including intermediate enrolment targets and estimates of the required financial, technical, human and organizational resources.

A National Education Standards Authority shall also be established. The standards shall not prevent a provincial and area government from having its own standards above the prescribed minimum.

In the proposed NEP, it has been said that analysis reveals that Pakistan has made progress on a number of education indicators in recent years. Notwithstanding the progress, education in Pakistan suffers from two key deficiencies at all levels of education, access to educational opportunities remains low and the quality of education is weak, not only in relation to Pakistan's goals themselves but also in international comparisons with the reference countries.

The proposed policy says that on the Education Development Index, which combines all educational access measures, Pakistan lies at the bottom with Bangladesh and is considerably below in comparison to Sri Lanka. A similar picture is painted by the gross enrolment ratios that combine all education sectors, and by the adult literacy rate measures.

"The overall Human Development Index (HDI) for Pakistan stands at 0.55, which is marginally better than that of Bangladesh and Nepal but poorer than other countries in the region," the document says.

The report also shows that while Pakistan's HDI has improved over the years the rate of progress in other countries has been higher. Bangladesh, starting at a lower base has caught up, while other countries have further improved upon their relative advantage. These developments do not augur well for Pakistan's competitive position in the international economy. As the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) shows, Pakistan's performance is weak, on the health- and education-related elements of competitiveness, when compared with its major competitors such as India, China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Malaysia.

The NEP says that the accent was on education for the few, basically to fill public service jobs. The prevailing objective was service to the administration rather than service to the students and learners. This assessment is echoed by the Economist's Intelligence Unit's assessment in its latest review of education, in which it observes that, "Pakistan's education system is among the most deficient and backward in Asia, reflecting the traditional determination of feudal ruling elite to preserve its hegemony". Second, the economic structure of Pakistan at its inception was almost entirely agrarian, with little manufacturing and a small services sector. The skill needs of the economy did not influence the structure of educational provisions. The tradition of British education, which Pakistan inherited, emphasized academic skills, to serve the administration, rather than skills and competence for use in the production sector.

The NEP said that one piece of evidence relates to the amount of development funds allocated to the sector that remains unspent. Estimates range from 10% to 30% of allocated funds remaining un-utilized. The underlying causes may lie in the lack of a planning culture, planning capacity and weaknesses in the accountability mechanisms.

Another type of implementation problem surfaces in the corruption that is believed to pervade the system. Anecdotes abound of education allocations systematically diverted to personal use at most levels of the allocation chain. Political influence and favoritism are believed to interfere in the allocation of resources to the districts and schools, in recruitment, training and posting of teachers and school administrators that are not based on merit, in the awarding of textbook contracts, and in the conduct of examinations and assessments.

The NEP added that the plans shall also promote equity in education with the aim of eliminating social exclusion and promoting national cohesion. Greater opportunities shall be provided to marginalized groups of society, particularly girls. Governments shall improve quality of educational provision at all levels of education. National standards for educational institutions and learning outcomes shall be determined. Steps shall be taken to make educational provisions relevant for the labor market and for promoting innovation in the economy, by giving greater emphasis to vocational and technical education and by restructuring study programmes and curricula to offer more applied learning options. Daily Times

Post your comments



Post your Feedback about information available on this page.